Wednesday, June 28, 2006

It's not rocket surgery

To Australia Talks Back (June 27, 2006):

'Criterion' is the singular; 'criteria' is the plural.

People haven't 'rang in', they have 'rung in'.

There, that wasn't very hard, was it?

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Out of his depth

Counterpoint presenter Michael Duffy (June 26, 2006) asks why, if people don't protest when killer whales kill humpback whales, they should protest when Japanese fishing companies do.

If you don't understand by now, Mr Duffy, don't mess with it.

Tagged: , , , ,

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Be assured. Be very, very assured

Yesterday ABC Radio National News used the word 'sovereignity'. I feel we can be pretty much assured that the word 'sovereignty' was meant, and that no new word has been coined without our noticing. I'm sure it's just an ABC journalism thing.

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Exactly

Heard on Radio National's Rear Vision last week: "While tobacco use goes back thousands of years, its modern use is a recent phenomenon."

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Learning Latin with Country Breakfast

Heard on Country Breakfast this morning, in an interview with a farmer of Australian bush tucker plants (paraphrase):

Interviewer: "So, the Finger lime is Microcitrus australien ... Micro, that would mean 'small'? Citrus: 'citrus-like'. And australien ... that would be 'Australian'?"

Farmer: "Yes."

Asked without a hint of irony, and it's not a show for primary school children.

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Be my guest. Now shut up.

In keeping with this blog's raisons d'etre, which includes a critique of ABC Radio National's self-removal from listener feedback, a word about RN website guestbooks.

In contrast to millions upon millions of personal websites whose owners bravely risk publishing the views of their readers, not all RN program webpages have guestbooks. For example, if you want to express to the Breakfast show disappointment that they headline sport above the state of the nation, the state of the planet, or international crises, apparently there's no guestbook available. If there is one, I couldn't find it and I withdraw my remark.

And, apparently, those that have guestbooks, such as the Counterpoint guestbook, there is no form field in which the commenter may type his or her own webpage or favourite site. It's a pity that ABC-RN doesn't allow this Internet convention and one can only wonder why it should be so. It seems to be just another example of the station's elitism.

Most webmasters moderate their guestbooks; that is, the webmaster usually adjusts the book's settings to require webmaster approval before a comment gets posted. This is reasonable, as it prevents the posting of spam, obscenities and very cranky or abusive feedback. Likewise, ABC-RN guestbooks filter out such posts, and it would be churlish to be critical of this practice. I have several moderated guestbooks, and reader criticism and suggestions have been invaluable to my efforts to improve the quality of my sites. (Regrettably my blog host, Blogger, does not allow a URL field in its Comments form; I refer only to my guestbooks.)

However, my own experience with several guestbook comments that I have made at RN -- polite, brief comments, although not necessarily ones that the programs wish to read (or have their readers see) -- is that they are usually filtered out.

Like the ABC Radio practice of frequently asking for listeners' emails (and here I speak of ABC generally, including News Radio, local radio as well as RN), but replying extremely rarely to such feedback emails, the ABC-RN guestbook practice verges on resembling window dressing.

My modest proposal is that all the programs have guestbooks, each with the barest minimum of moderation, and with the conventional form field in which listeners may place a URL. RN should not be afraid of letting 1,000 flowers bloom; it would brighten the place up a bit and, I believe, help ABC get back on the road to reflecting the thoughts of the Australian general public, whom it ostensibly serves. Australians who can read and write, at any rate. How the disenfranchised illiterate people might be catered for is beyond me, and up till now beyond ABC.

Tagged: , , , ,

Monday, June 19, 2006

Intertextuality of interview and research

It's Monday morning.

On Friday's Life Matters, the promo for today's program said that there would be a discussion about Tourette Syndrome. This morning the journalist was interviewing the author of a book on the subject, a British gentleman who has the syndrome himself.

A couple of minutes into the interview, the journalist asked (and I paraphrase from memory): "So, Tourette Syndrome ... I'm not sure I understand ... is that the condition where people feel compelled to swear?"

Postmodern journalism: practise the intertextuality of interview and research. The order in which they occur is a construct of society and thus immaterial, so forget about it.

Tagged: , , , , ,

Saturday, June 17, 2006

I pro-test on behalf of a fine round fellow

The little, cute, chubby letter 'o' has at least three ways it likes to be addressed.

There is the short 'o' sound, as in 'hot', the long 'o' sound as in 'omen', and, just because our chubby friend is an individual, the short 'i' sound as in 'women'. (He's a funny fellow, our 'o'.)

Thus, when we come across words like 'process' and 'project', little 'o' challenges us to make a decision. How will we pronounce the 'o'?

We may immediately discard the possibility that 'o' will have an 'i' sound (as in 'women'). That just won't do, of course.

So we are presented with a choice. Will we pronounce it as Australians do, with a long 'o' (as in 'protest' and 'program'), or as Americans do, with a short?

In the last year or two, ABC Radio National announcers and presenters apparently have decided that the Australian pronunciation is to be eschewed, so most of the time you will hear the American pronunciation, and your ears will bleed a little.

My only question is this. Why?

No. I have another question. Will SCOSE (ABC's Standing Committee on Spoken English) ever do anything about it?

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 09, 2006

A diversion

PM: Is it not that we "divert traffic from", not "divert traffic away from"?